Poll Results #2! Gaza Conflict!
How should the U.S. respond to the Present Gaza conflict?
Make a UN Resolution/Force a ceasefire: 0 votes: 0%
Militarily side with Hamas: 0 votes: 0%
Help Israel (with supplies): 0 votes: 0%
Mind its own business: 1 votes: 100%
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Gaza Conflict!
What do you think about the Gaza conflict between the IDF and Hamas?
Should the U.S. and/or UN intervene?
Should the U.S. and/or UN intervene?
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Critique of "What Makes Western Culture Unique"
Critique of What Makes Western Culture Unique. This essay "What Makes Western Culture Unique," was written by Professor Kevin MacDonald.
Sorry for the procrastination. I was also very busy!
Professor Kevin MacDonald teaches Psychology at California State University. Although I disagree with him, on a "grand Jewish conspiracy to control Western Culture," he does have great experience and some merit for praise.
He states Western Culture is unique. This, I agree with. His reasons (typed verbatim) therefore are:
1. the Catholic Church and Christianity [Blogger's note:I agree, Europeans and near Easterners (white Middle Easterners (Semites)) uphold Christianity in a manner largely unpracticed by the other races.]
2. A tendency to monogamy [Bloggers note: especially in relation to non-Whites of non-Northern Asian/Canadian descent]
3. A tendency toward simple family structure based on the nuclear family. [Yes, this is a relatively unique Western characteristic, as non-Whites have very high illegitimacy rates in Western countries, while Europe's have tried to stick to the family model, with much better success. However, Northern Asians also well-known for at least maintaining a low illegitimacy rate outside of China. Monogamy and relative lack of illegitimacy are still Western characteristics which make it unique.]
4. A greater tendency for marriage to be compassionate and based on mutual affection of the partners. [I would say this is true, although I don't have any scientific (empirical) facts to support it. However, I do believe White males are usually more likely to marry out of personal affection than out of social status. On the other hand, many non-White males love to show off White (sexual) mates.]
5. A de-emphasis on extended kinship relationships and its correlative, a relative lack of ethnocentrism. [Whites do get ethnocentric, with the right stimulus. However, this is very true in relative terms. Almost only Whites can be fully racial guilt-tripped (with the only possible exception being Northern Asians, but they haven't been tested yet). In relative terms, Whites ignore racial interests. Even in times of Radical White Racism, as in the Jim Crow South, Whites still showed compassion, which would not have been significantly present, had the racial dominance been reversed.]
6. A tendency toward individualism and all of its implications: individual rights against the state, representative government, moral universalism, and science. [This is very likely true, as Whites continue to support democratic-republican principles as no other major groups do outside of America. Whites are also super-empathetic, hence their massive support for protecting non-White and even animal groups. Ironically, Environmental and Animals Rights groups are (generally) proportionately "more White" than conservative pro-life groups!
Whites are also very individualistic and more resistant to communism and excessive collectivism.]
I agree with the influence of the Christian Church. However, I also believe the Jewish Church is also a successful influence and strong characteristic of the Jewish people.
I also agree with him on monogamy and most of the rest of the essay. However, I don't fully agree on the differences between Europeans and Jews (& other Semites). There are technically differences between (non-Southern) Europeans and Jews. However, I find them exaggerated, as he listed them. Before I list examples, it should noted that Jewish behavior is more like (non-Southern) Europeans, than many Southern European groups (probably due to Arab and Black admixture?)
With evolutionary history, it is true that Middle Easterners had a relatively larger herding business, and Europeans relied more hunter-gathering. However, Israel's climate most resembled Southern Europe, and required a level of hunter-gathering, even a few thousand years ago. The Near East was also affected by the Ice Age.
On family systems, I do agree, Jews tend to better associate more with extended families and ethnic communities, just as the Greeks and Italians do, as well. They claim it's culture. It probably is, but I do think Professor MacDonald has a point here.
I don't think the Jews are particularly patriarchal; they actually have leading activists for women's rights. Although I will concede they may be slightly more so, in normal times (with psychological bias absent), they resemble White Gentiles much more than they resemble non-Whites in this area of activism, as they do in most every other field (of behavioral areas) under
study.
I also find the complete omission of monogamy under the "Jewish" category very interesting, as polygamy was hardly practiced by the Jews, outside of royalty, after their formation as an official ethnic group (following Jacob and his children). Other Semitic groups appeared to end polygamy outside of royalty, when their settlements were firmly established.
The practice of polygamy in Islam is an Arabic tradition, not a White Semitic one. Judaism is much less pro-polygamy, than say, unreformed Mormonism.
I also think, what's keeping the Jewish intermarriage rate at around 50% and not higher is culture and religion. But if the Jews are a completely different race from Whites, than their racial out-marriage is higher than ours.
I also disagree on marriage psychology, although he is right to a slight extent. White Gentile families practiced arranged marriage for family wealth and prestige, at times. And Jews likely married for love (as opposed to financially arranged), on a similar level to probably Southern Europeans and White Turks. This has a grain of truth in terms of culture, comparing Israel to deep northern climates. However, I think even the cultural aspect, making even deep Southern Europeans look 'black and white' more 'love-based' and less ethnocentric (than Jews) is exaggerated.
I also find the idea that Jews are particularly patriarchal, laughable. Jews are proportionately, more liberal than even White Gentiles, and support women's right & feminism. Some dismiss the Jews as "just another non-White group." However, the Jews (who are White) have leading women with White Gentiles, in disproportionate numbers. Jewish men also much more resemble European men than they do, Hispanic and Black men, in treatment and attitude toward women.
Jews are not listed as individualistic, but collectivist. I think they would be the latter, in the Soviet sense, for cultural reasons and persecution. Judaism is in between, supporting individual responsibility and support for the religious community. The same applies to Christianity. Maybe he was referring to pre-Christian European culture. If so, I don't know much thereabout. However, I still think Whites (both Gentile and Jewish) are more individualistic and republican than non-White groups.
The Jews are listed as Hyper-ethnocentric and Hyper-xenophobic. I strongly disagree with this assessment, as the Jews tend to be leading liberals. The state of Israel is also being very kind, in its reaction, to Palestinians. It deals with terrorist attacks on civilian population centers on a regular basis; yet, the Jews do whatever they can, to prevent Palestinian casualties. I find the idea that Jews are particularly ethnocentric and xenophobic silly and as a classic exaggeration. The Jews are overwhelmingly non-ethnocentric!
I will agree, Jews are slightly more collectivist, with their community. However, that is for cultural reasons. They promote culture, but they are actually poor in recognizing their genetic nation and supernation.
I also find it hard to understand how Jews "oppose reason and science, whilst supporting dogmatism and submission," when they make such a disproportionate share of Nobel Prize winners and inventors!
http://www.jinfo.org/Nobel_Prizes.html
The Jews promote moral universalism, with Judaism and behavior. They do not support just "What is good for the Jews?" Most are genuinely liberal and believe in the protection of all human life. They are genetically very similar to Europeans.
"On the other hand, group strategies deriving from collectivist cultures, such as Judaism, are immune to such a maneuver because kinship and group ties come first. Morality is particularistic—whatever is good for the group. There is no tradition of altruistic punishment because the evolutionary history of these groups centers around cooperation of close kin, not strangers."
Genetically, Jews are very similar to Europeans. Liberal Jews play the game of "altruistic punishment," themselves. They are under the same pressures as White Gentiles are; racist Jews get censured by other Jews for racial slurs against non-whites.
Culturally speaking, Judaism did promote community involvement. However, it did provide universal moralism, and eventually brought in converts. The Jewish tribe was slightly ethnocentric, but in the same sense that Celtic, Nordic, and Germanic tribes were. They had a very similar system. And Judaism is a more advanced religion and universally accepting than ancient paganism.
I think the best strategy is to appreciate what makes Western Culture unique, as he stated. People of Jewish descent do have some of the differences as he stated, to a minimal extent. However, I believe Jews are a part of Western Culture, especially when compared to (Brown)
Arabs, Blacks, Brown Asians, and Brown Hispanics. If Jews have the alleged differences between White Gentiles and Jews; and they are as to be viewed as, as big as claimed, than I would be most interested to see the categories for Black Africans.
There is a cultural difference and a smaller genetic difference. However, I think they are exaggerated. A major issue is empathy and higher levels of thinking. Both White Gentiles and Jews hold this in disproportionate degrees!
I also see the conspiracy theory of "Jews plotting to destroy Western Culture" as absurd and even inappropriate for an academic essay, especially for a scholar of Mr. MacDonald's skill level and profession.
Most of the rest of the WMWCU Essay is well done. Western Culture is unique and worth preserving. Let's not neglect and lose the culture of our ancestors!
The Essay of What Makes Western Culture Unique can be accessed with this hyperlink:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/West-TOQ.htm
Sorry for the procrastination. I was also very busy!
Professor Kevin MacDonald teaches Psychology at California State University. Although I disagree with him, on a "grand Jewish conspiracy to control Western Culture," he does have great experience and some merit for praise.
He states Western Culture is unique. This, I agree with. His reasons (typed verbatim) therefore are:
1. the Catholic Church and Christianity [Blogger's note:I agree, Europeans and near Easterners (white Middle Easterners (Semites)) uphold Christianity in a manner largely unpracticed by the other races.]
2. A tendency to monogamy [Bloggers note: especially in relation to non-Whites of non-Northern Asian/Canadian descent]
3. A tendency toward simple family structure based on the nuclear family. [Yes, this is a relatively unique Western characteristic, as non-Whites have very high illegitimacy rates in Western countries, while Europe's have tried to stick to the family model, with much better success. However, Northern Asians also well-known for at least maintaining a low illegitimacy rate outside of China. Monogamy and relative lack of illegitimacy are still Western characteristics which make it unique.]
4. A greater tendency for marriage to be compassionate and based on mutual affection of the partners. [I would say this is true, although I don't have any scientific (empirical) facts to support it. However, I do believe White males are usually more likely to marry out of personal affection than out of social status. On the other hand, many non-White males love to show off White (sexual) mates.]
5. A de-emphasis on extended kinship relationships and its correlative, a relative lack of ethnocentrism. [Whites do get ethnocentric, with the right stimulus. However, this is very true in relative terms. Almost only Whites can be fully racial guilt-tripped (with the only possible exception being Northern Asians, but they haven't been tested yet). In relative terms, Whites ignore racial interests. Even in times of Radical White Racism, as in the Jim Crow South, Whites still showed compassion, which would not have been significantly present, had the racial dominance been reversed.]
6. A tendency toward individualism and all of its implications: individual rights against the state, representative government, moral universalism, and science. [This is very likely true, as Whites continue to support democratic-republican principles as no other major groups do outside of America. Whites are also super-empathetic, hence their massive support for protecting non-White and even animal groups. Ironically, Environmental and Animals Rights groups are (generally) proportionately "more White" than conservative pro-life groups!
Whites are also very individualistic and more resistant to communism and excessive collectivism.]
I agree with the influence of the Christian Church. However, I also believe the Jewish Church is also a successful influence and strong characteristic of the Jewish people.
I also agree with him on monogamy and most of the rest of the essay. However, I don't fully agree on the differences between Europeans and Jews (& other Semites). There are technically differences between (non-Southern) Europeans and Jews. However, I find them exaggerated, as he listed them. Before I list examples, it should noted that Jewish behavior is more like (non-Southern) Europeans, than many Southern European groups (probably due to Arab and Black admixture?)
With evolutionary history, it is true that Middle Easterners had a relatively larger herding business, and Europeans relied more hunter-gathering. However, Israel's climate most resembled Southern Europe, and required a level of hunter-gathering, even a few thousand years ago. The Near East was also affected by the Ice Age.
On family systems, I do agree, Jews tend to better associate more with extended families and ethnic communities, just as the Greeks and Italians do, as well. They claim it's culture. It probably is, but I do think Professor MacDonald has a point here.
I don't think the Jews are particularly patriarchal; they actually have leading activists for women's rights. Although I will concede they may be slightly more so, in normal times (with psychological bias absent), they resemble White Gentiles much more than they resemble non-Whites in this area of activism, as they do in most every other field (of behavioral areas) under
study.
I also find the complete omission of monogamy under the "Jewish" category very interesting, as polygamy was hardly practiced by the Jews, outside of royalty, after their formation as an official ethnic group (following Jacob and his children). Other Semitic groups appeared to end polygamy outside of royalty, when their settlements were firmly established.
The practice of polygamy in Islam is an Arabic tradition, not a White Semitic one. Judaism is much less pro-polygamy, than say, unreformed Mormonism.
I also think, what's keeping the Jewish intermarriage rate at around 50% and not higher is culture and religion. But if the Jews are a completely different race from Whites, than their racial out-marriage is higher than ours.
I also disagree on marriage psychology, although he is right to a slight extent. White Gentile families practiced arranged marriage for family wealth and prestige, at times. And Jews likely married for love (as opposed to financially arranged), on a similar level to probably Southern Europeans and White Turks. This has a grain of truth in terms of culture, comparing Israel to deep northern climates. However, I think even the cultural aspect, making even deep Southern Europeans look 'black and white' more 'love-based' and less ethnocentric (than Jews) is exaggerated.
I also find the idea that Jews are particularly patriarchal, laughable. Jews are proportionately, more liberal than even White Gentiles, and support women's right & feminism. Some dismiss the Jews as "just another non-White group." However, the Jews (who are White) have leading women with White Gentiles, in disproportionate numbers. Jewish men also much more resemble European men than they do, Hispanic and Black men, in treatment and attitude toward women.
Jews are not listed as individualistic, but collectivist. I think they would be the latter, in the Soviet sense, for cultural reasons and persecution. Judaism is in between, supporting individual responsibility and support for the religious community. The same applies to Christianity. Maybe he was referring to pre-Christian European culture. If so, I don't know much thereabout. However, I still think Whites (both Gentile and Jewish) are more individualistic and republican than non-White groups.
The Jews are listed as Hyper-ethnocentric and Hyper-xenophobic. I strongly disagree with this assessment, as the Jews tend to be leading liberals. The state of Israel is also being very kind, in its reaction, to Palestinians. It deals with terrorist attacks on civilian population centers on a regular basis; yet, the Jews do whatever they can, to prevent Palestinian casualties. I find the idea that Jews are particularly ethnocentric and xenophobic silly and as a classic exaggeration. The Jews are overwhelmingly non-ethnocentric!
I will agree, Jews are slightly more collectivist, with their community. However, that is for cultural reasons. They promote culture, but they are actually poor in recognizing their genetic nation and supernation.
I also find it hard to understand how Jews "oppose reason and science, whilst supporting dogmatism and submission," when they make such a disproportionate share of Nobel Prize winners and inventors!
http://www.jinfo.org/Nobel_Prizes.html
The Jews promote moral universalism, with Judaism and behavior. They do not support just "What is good for the Jews?" Most are genuinely liberal and believe in the protection of all human life. They are genetically very similar to Europeans.
"On the other hand, group strategies deriving from collectivist cultures, such as Judaism, are immune to such a maneuver because kinship and group ties come first. Morality is particularistic—whatever is good for the group. There is no tradition of altruistic punishment because the evolutionary history of these groups centers around cooperation of close kin, not strangers."
Genetically, Jews are very similar to Europeans. Liberal Jews play the game of "altruistic punishment," themselves. They are under the same pressures as White Gentiles are; racist Jews get censured by other Jews for racial slurs against non-whites.
Culturally speaking, Judaism did promote community involvement. However, it did provide universal moralism, and eventually brought in converts. The Jewish tribe was slightly ethnocentric, but in the same sense that Celtic, Nordic, and Germanic tribes were. They had a very similar system. And Judaism is a more advanced religion and universally accepting than ancient paganism.
I think the best strategy is to appreciate what makes Western Culture unique, as he stated. People of Jewish descent do have some of the differences as he stated, to a minimal extent. However, I believe Jews are a part of Western Culture, especially when compared to (Brown)
Arabs, Blacks, Brown Asians, and Brown Hispanics. If Jews have the alleged differences between White Gentiles and Jews; and they are as to be viewed as, as big as claimed, than I would be most interested to see the categories for Black Africans.
There is a cultural difference and a smaller genetic difference. However, I think they are exaggerated. A major issue is empathy and higher levels of thinking. Both White Gentiles and Jews hold this in disproportionate degrees!
I also see the conspiracy theory of "Jews plotting to destroy Western Culture" as absurd and even inappropriate for an academic essay, especially for a scholar of Mr. MacDonald's skill level and profession.
Most of the rest of the WMWCU Essay is well done. Western Culture is unique and worth preserving. Let's not neglect and lose the culture of our ancestors!
The Essay of What Makes Western Culture Unique can be accessed with this hyperlink:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/West-TOQ.htm
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Obama won the 2008 Election, with a minority of White votes.
Barak Hussein Obama won the 2008 election.
Whites actually voted for John McCain, 55-43; over 56%, according to the tv news I heard.
Don't quote me, as I don't have a confirmable hyperlink, right now. But this is what I saw on the televison.
Whites actually voted for John McCain, 55-43; over 56%, according to the tv news I heard.
Don't quote me, as I don't have a confirmable hyperlink, right now. But this is what I saw on the televison.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Poll Results!
Poll Results:
John McCain: 3 (75%)
Barak Husein Obama: 0
Ralph "Spoiler" Nader: 0
Bob Barr: 0
Other: 1 (25%)
Votes: 4
John McCain: 3 (75%)
Barak Husein Obama: 0
Ralph "Spoiler" Nader: 0
Bob Barr: 0
Other: 1 (25%)
Votes: 4
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Note for Jews! Part 4
A fourth, and potentially most dangerous threat resides in the Islamic presence in the West. Muslims are especially in Europe.
Islam. A great expansionist religion, seeking conquest and Jihad of the whole world. As well-evidenced, Islam is a foreign and competing Relgion, belief system with Judeo-Christianity. It's a threat to not only Europeans and Christians. It's also a threat to ethnic and relgious Jews. In this post, I hope to demonstrate why Christians and Jews need to unite, to protect the state of Israel and all other White and Christian nations. This applies especially to the future conflict in Europe. We will likely see a three player clash. Western Civilization will be stuck in the middle between Brown Arabs and Islam to the South and East. To the South on the western plank, the Brown Hispanic threat will thrive and expand.
It's well-known that a number of Jews promote even Islamic immigration into Europe. The reason therefore is likely justified in fear of authoriatative rule. Nationalism has an unfair association with Nazism and genocidial anti-Semitism. This analogy is inaccurate, and misrepresents the inalienable right of peoples to have and maintain self-preservation.
It should also be noted that Islam is a bigger threat to the Jews than even nationalism. Islam will curtail individual and religous freedoms. Muslims are also very racist and anti-Semitic.
Pew survey, May 2003, reported in International Herald Tribune, June 3, 2003 (here and here).
The majority in Morocco, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Kuwait, Lebanon, Indonesia and Pakistan want to end the state of Israel.
A Year After Iraq War - survey, March 16, 2004
The majority in Jordan support suicide bombing of Jews.
The majority in Morocco support suicide bombing of Jews.
The majority who expressed an opinion in Pakistan support suicide bombing of Jews.
Note: In notes to Women and Jews, it's not my intention to appear rude or even patronizing. It's solely my intent to give advice to both groups (because I care for them, even though I don't belong to either; and it's in the best interests of Jews, White women, and White Gentile males, to unite and not be divided by social whims).
Islam. A great expansionist religion, seeking conquest and Jihad of the whole world. As well-evidenced, Islam is a foreign and competing Relgion, belief system with Judeo-Christianity. It's a threat to not only Europeans and Christians. It's also a threat to ethnic and relgious Jews. In this post, I hope to demonstrate why Christians and Jews need to unite, to protect the state of Israel and all other White and Christian nations. This applies especially to the future conflict in Europe. We will likely see a three player clash. Western Civilization will be stuck in the middle between Brown Arabs and Islam to the South and East. To the South on the western plank, the Brown Hispanic threat will thrive and expand.
It's well-known that a number of Jews promote even Islamic immigration into Europe. The reason therefore is likely justified in fear of authoriatative rule. Nationalism has an unfair association with Nazism and genocidial anti-Semitism. This analogy is inaccurate, and misrepresents the inalienable right of peoples to have and maintain self-preservation.
It should also be noted that Islam is a bigger threat to the Jews than even nationalism. Islam will curtail individual and religous freedoms. Muslims are also very racist and anti-Semitic.
Pew survey, May 2003, reported in International Herald Tribune, June 3, 2003 (here and here).
The majority in Morocco, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Kuwait, Lebanon, Indonesia and Pakistan want to end the state of Israel.
A Year After Iraq War - survey, March 16, 2004
The majority in Jordan support suicide bombing of Jews.
The majority in Morocco support suicide bombing of Jews.
The majority who expressed an opinion in Pakistan support suicide bombing of Jews.
Sources:
http://markhumphrys.com/islamic.world.html
http://markhumphrys.com/israel.html#ww2
Islam is not tolerant of the Jewish and Christian people. There is more content I could add, but I don't have the time and/or convenience to do so. We will likely see a global conflict, and the Jewish ethnic and religious people and European Christians will be at a grave risk. The upcoming global conflict could be the next major test for Europe, in stopping foreign invasions. Likewise for Jews facing another attempt at complete genocide. Suggested locations for Jews, are Argentina & Chile (last resorts) and safe rural (though probably out of the Deep South) areas in White-majority areas of America. In Europe, Jews should just look for areas least likely to get caught up in the Christianity-Islam conflict. Whatever the case is, we must unite now!Note: In notes to Women and Jews, it's not my intention to appear rude or even patronizing. It's solely my intent to give advice to both groups (because I care for them, even though I don't belong to either; and it's in the best interests of Jews, White women, and White Gentile males, to unite and not be divided by social whims).
Friday, October 31, 2008
Note for Jews! Part 3!
Non-Whites are not of your kind. They threaten the whole White race, and potentially the Jews as a distinct people.
Eddie Murphy: "Don't Let me down, Don't let me down,(oh yeh), Dont let me down, Hymietown" skit- Eddie Murphy on Saturday Night Live
http://blogs.uptownlife.net/paulstewart/?p=15
(source: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hymie)
Jesse Jackson referrd to New York City as Hymietown, and Jews as Hymies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jackson#1984_presidential_campaign
Anti-Semitism Among Black Student Groups.
http://www.adl.org/poisoning_web/black_bigots.asp
Racial Disparity in hardcore/Strong anti-Semitism.
Foreign-born Hispanics:44%, Blacks:35%, native-born Hispanics: 20%, Overall: 17%
Whites are apparently less than 17%, as the overall is lower than the that of the other races. I also suspect the Hispanic anti-Semitism is higher, among the native-born, especially in the gangs.
Not to forget Louis Farrakhan of Nation of Islam.
Jewish Leaders fear anti-Semitism among Hispanic Immigrants.
I even found a Hispanic Blog accusing Jews of taxing food products, through Kosher labeling. It called it a ? scam. I lost track thereof. I also saw a clip of Mexican saying "they should have dropped a hydrogen bomb on Jewish-sh*t-town Manhattan." I lost track of the latter, too.
It is obvious that non-Whites would be more anti-Semitic, as they are differnt races. It also wouldn't make sense for non-Whites to be pro-Jew, but anti-White Gentile. They dislike, by appearances. If a non-White is about to kill in a race war, don't just shout, "I am a Jew. I am a Jew!" That will actually make the potential assassin more eager to kill. They know who has the most influence; and many (though not all) are jealous.
Black Professor calls for extermination of Whites. Does one truly think the Jews would be an exception? They own a disproportionate share, whichof Whites own a disproportionate share.
It's also silly to have an inter-racial "alliance," whereby an ethnic group betrays its race, in favor of a foreign subspecies. Blacks know this, and most such Blacks only use the Jews, for Black power. In the end, many now, and even more will want us all dead. Now, we need "liberal" Jews to realize this, before it's too late.
(The only benefits of this facade is that Jews can sneak money from Blacks, to give to their racial interests, and potential infiltration. The future Black armies will be very anti-Semtic in nature, and Jews may have an opportunity to sabotage the Nation of Islam, just as it did to Nazism.)
Eddie Murphy: "Don't Let me down, Don't let me down,(oh yeh), Dont let me down, Hymietown" skit- Eddie Murphy on Saturday Night Live
http://blogs.uptownlife.net/paulstewart/?p=15
(source: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hymie)
Jesse Jackson referrd to New York City as Hymietown, and Jews as Hymies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Jackson#1984_presidential_campaign
Anti-Semitism Among Black Student Groups.
http://www.adl.org/poisoning_web/black_bigots.asp
Racial Disparity in hardcore/Strong anti-Semitism.
Foreign-born Hispanics:44%, Blacks:35%, native-born Hispanics: 20%, Overall: 17%
Whites are apparently less than 17%, as the overall is lower than the that of the other races. I also suspect the Hispanic anti-Semitism is higher, among the native-born, especially in the gangs.
Not to forget Louis Farrakhan of Nation of Islam.
Jewish Leaders fear anti-Semitism among Hispanic Immigrants.
I even found a Hispanic Blog accusing Jews of taxing food products, through Kosher labeling. It called it a ? scam. I lost track thereof. I also saw a clip of Mexican saying "they should have dropped a hydrogen bomb on Jewish-sh*t-town Manhattan." I lost track of the latter, too.
It is obvious that non-Whites would be more anti-Semitic, as they are differnt races. It also wouldn't make sense for non-Whites to be pro-Jew, but anti-White Gentile. They dislike, by appearances. If a non-White is about to kill in a race war, don't just shout, "I am a Jew. I am a Jew!" That will actually make the potential assassin more eager to kill. They know who has the most influence; and many (though not all) are jealous.
Black Professor calls for extermination of Whites. Does one truly think the Jews would be an exception? They own a disproportionate share, whichof Whites own a disproportionate share.
It's also silly to have an inter-racial "alliance," whereby an ethnic group betrays its race, in favor of a foreign subspecies. Blacks know this, and most such Blacks only use the Jews, for Black power. In the end, many now, and even more will want us all dead. Now, we need "liberal" Jews to realize this, before it's too late.
(The only benefits of this facade is that Jews can sneak money from Blacks, to give to their racial interests, and potential infiltration. The future Black armies will be very anti-Semtic in nature, and Jews may have an opportunity to sabotage the Nation of Islam, just as it did to Nazism.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)